<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shoe Hot or Not: Candie&#8217;s edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/</link>
	<description>Fashion, beauty and shopping ideas from former Tribune style editor Sam Mittelsteadt.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judith G.</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3407</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3407</guid>
		<description>I can't say that I really like these shoes...as others have mentioned they are a bit lke some pilgrim style shos.  The jewelry looks awesome.  Thanks to Miachelle for donating them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say that I really like these shoes&#8230;as others have mentioned they are a bit lke some pilgrim style shos.  The jewelry looks awesome.  Thanks to Miachelle for donating them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>Can you say "Mary Poppins"? Yet in some ways I like it. More 20 years ago than now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you say &#8220;Mary Poppins&#8221;? Yet in some ways I like it. More 20 years ago than now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Bocchine</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3368</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Bocchine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3368</guid>
		<description>NOT HOT! 

Thank you Miachelle for sending me an email about this blog!  I LOVE SHOES and will totally be a regular viewer!

p.s. Miachelle's jewelry is amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOT HOT! </p>
<p>Thank you Miachelle for sending me an email about this blog!  I LOVE SHOES and will totally be a regular viewer!</p>
<p>p.s. Miachelle&#8217;s jewelry is amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Di Staulo</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Di Staulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3367</guid>
		<description>If i recall correctly, in grade school, in the pictures they showed us of the pilgrims, one could see this shoe. I never considered the pilgrims fashionably shod, but am retinking my position on it after viewing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i recall correctly, in grade school, in the pictures they showed us of the pilgrims, one could see this shoe. I never considered the pilgrims fashionably shod, but am retinking my position on it after viewing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3365</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3365</guid>
		<description>I think they definitely look like Pilgrim shoes. The heel and toe are fine. It's the buckle that does it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they definitely look like Pilgrim shoes. The heel and toe are fine. It&#8217;s the buckle that does it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miachelle</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator>Miachelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3362</guid>
		<description>EWWWWWW!  My precious toes would not slip into those!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EWWWWWW!  My precious toes would not slip into those!  <img src='http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3361</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3361</guid>
		<description>I actually don't think its that bad.  Like Sam said, I wouldn't go out of my way and go purchase them, but maybe if they were on clearance.  I think you could wear them with black pants, it would then kinda look like you were wearing boots.  They're alright:()</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually don&#8217;t think its that bad.  Like Sam said, I wouldn&#8217;t go out of my way and go purchase them, but maybe if they were on clearance.  I think you could wear them with black pants, it would then kinda look like you were wearing boots.  They&#8217;re alright:()</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie dba D.B.T.</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3360</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie dba D.B.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3360</guid>
		<description>If work with gray trousers, assuming you avoid "high-waters", it would just leave the cute Prada style tip and heel.  I say - it's just OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If work with gray trousers, assuming you avoid &#8220;high-waters&#8221;, it would just leave the cute Prada style tip and heel.  I say - it&#8217;s just OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>This shoe's just too klunky.......I do not this shoe attractive and would never draw compliments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shoe&#8217;s just too klunky&#8230;&#8230;.I do not this shoe attractive and would never draw compliments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sammit.freedomblogging.com/2008/08/19/shoe-hot-or-not-candies-edition/#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>Fugly, only because of the cheap-looking leather and hardware. The style itself is acceptable, but the execution sucks. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fugly, only because of the cheap-looking leather and hardware. The style itself is acceptable, but the execution sucks. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
