Dear Santa:
December 18th, 2007, 5:17 pm · 3 Comments · posted by Sam Mittelsteadt
My parents called the other day and asked what I want for Christmas. My mom reminded me that I used to be really “good” about this — I’d send them a list, even listing the stores that sold the items. But every year I get more and more in the mindset that I really don’t need anything — unless someone wants to treat me to a 10% down payment on a cute little ranch-style house, and really, if I can’t get around to saving it myself, why should I ask my parents to help?
“It’s not what you need,” my mom said. “It’s what you’d like.”
I started with a 24-pack of Sharpie ultrafine permanent markers. Last year when I pitched this idea I was greeted by dead silence, then a disbelieving: “You want markers for Christmas. And that’s it.” Well, yeah: I read a lot of page proofs at work, and whenever I make corrections or additions or changes, I want to make sure they’re visible. And I like to mix things up a bit, beyond the blue/black ink realm. (But not red: That reminds people of getting papers back in school with teachers’ marks all over them.) I also use ‘em when labeling CDs I’ve burned, or addressing manila envelopes, packages or those padded mailers. Plus, they look really cool on my desk, sitting in a spice rack, separated by color into groups of four (oranges, pinks, purples, browns, greens, blues). The other day when I was at Office Depot picking up photo-quality printer paper, I saw the 24-pack and almost bought it myself for immediate gratification. And the web site shows they actually have 39 colors. I have a new mission: tracking down the other 15.
I know I pimp Philosophy stuff all the time, but really, it’s a great line — and it’s buying local, because the company is based in the Valley. And I love, love, love Hope in a Jar moisturizer, which has been part part of my morning routine (and between testing other products at night, too) for years. I’m pretty sure on a really crazy day I’ve actually forgone brushing my teeth instead of skipping Hope in a Jar. I’ve always gone for the 2-ounce jar but last year Philosophy paired with a department store for a special-edition 4-ounce container, so I called their PR company … which inadvertently sent me an even larger container — the huge 8-ounce vat! It was like finding it at Costco quantities. My roommate and I divvied it up using a teaspoon, glopping it into our respective 2-ounce jars (and my 1-ounce travel-size container), and then I parceled the remainder out throughout the year.
For me the best way to start out a good dinner with friends is with champagne — not just at the holidays, either. I used to be on a perpetual quest to find the perfect set of 4 … or 6 … or 8 … glasses, but then the inevitable happened: Someone always broke one, and I would be left with 3, unable to replace it. And one year my friends Jeff and Greg bought me two really nice, heavy flutes from Crate & Barrel, which inspired me: Instead of trying to match everything, I decided to start collecting random ones two at a time. The only thing they’d have in common: They’re clear glass (or crystal) — no colored stems or bowls. Today I got a press release that included a link to these Float champagne flutes by Molo Design, in which the bowls aren’t suspended by stems, but rather in a cylinder. Pretty cool, huh? But at $98 a pair, I’m not sure this is the right year to be splurging for them. Plus, I’d be really upset if someone broke of them.
So I starting browsing the discount sites for flutes that went beyond the generic and boring ones you can buy by the case for a dollar at Ikea. I ended up springing for two of these handblown-glass Zara flutes, which I found for $4.95 each in the outlet section of the Crate & Barrel site. The bowls are actually squares, which makes them a little different, and the inverted-pyramid shape should make them easier to wash and dry than regular flutes, too — I hate trying to wedge a dish towel past the narrow rim of regular flutes in an effort to eradicate those water drops inside.
When it comes to recommending fragrances for readers, I try to err on the side of caution — even though I would never opt for Calvin Klein’s Obsession myself, for example, I can still appreciate why many people continue to buy it decades after its release. My tastes lie more in the unusual — I’d rather have a conversation-starting “What IS that?” scent than being the umpteenth guy in Acqua di Gio. (Sort of like how some rock snobs eschew their once-favorite bands once they hit critical mass, I guess.) On one hand, I’d like more people to appreciate the
fragrances I like. On the other, this way I’m unique! If I won a spree in scent land, I’d grab Cumming the Fragrance (with hints of peat mud, rubber, and which my old roommate always co-opted whenever he wanted to spritz up); Fou d’Absinthe by L’Artisan Parfumeur (absinthe, pepper, pine); Cannabis Santal by Fresh (cannabis, patchouli, rose); and Odeur 53 by Comme de Garcons, whose description delights me so much I had to copy it: “oxygen, flash of metal, fire energy, washing drying in the wind, mineral carbon, sand dunes, nail polish, cellulose, pure air of the high mountains, ultimate fusion, burnt rubber, flaming rock.”









December 21st, 2007 at 4:28 pm
I have to ask..how good is Hope in a Jar for ANY skin type? I’m very leery of products that make such claims, because I find I’m usually the one who reacts and breaks out. Case in point: I cannot wear Bare Essentials mineral make-up. It makes my skin itch, and I want to claw it desperately because of the itching. The ensuing breakout is not pretty. I was told by an Ulta employee the BE rep stated it has corn starch, which some people are allergic to.
Not being snarky, just always on the lookout for products that are fabulous but skin-friendly. Example: I love Dermalogica’s Active Moist. Absolutely terrific!
Thanks!
December 22nd, 2007 at 6:10 pm
There are actually TWO formulations of Hope in a Jar — the “original formula for all skin types” and another (the same price) for dry,sensitive skin. The second formula removes potential irritants like lactic acid (although the exfoliating benefits are part of why I like the original formula) and betaglucan (ditto).
I found the second a little too intensive for my liking — but then again, I used to buy the saline solutions that WEREN’T “for sensitive eyes” because my eyes aren’t.
I’ve had only one friend report any breakouts from the original Hope in a Jar. (Sorry, KC!)
I would *highly* recommend swinging by the freestanding Philosophy store the next time you’re anywhere near Casa Paloma shopping center (I-10 and Ray Road, with the AJ’s Fine Foods). The staff really knows their stuff and are happy to walk you through the items — whenever I take a friend in, I ask them to demonstrate one of the peels, and they’re always accommodating. (If you ask nice, I bet they’d give you samples of each to try before you commit to one or the other.)
Sometimes when you switch skin care products, there is an acclimation period where your skin reacts to the new regimen, but it usually doesn’t last long and I never had that happen with HiaJ. (Again, see above re sensitivity.)
I have GOT to post an article about mineral makeup and how it’s not particularly greater than any other products out there. I think it was by Paula Begoin of “Don’t Go to the Cosmetics Counter Without Me” …
December 24th, 2007 at 8:42 am
Thanks Sam!
And an article on mineral makeup would be terrific. Believe it or not, I don’t know why, I can’t wear Bare Essentials, but Ulta’s mineral makeup doesn’t bother me. Go figure–the price difference is huge.
Trust me, if you need a tester for skin irritation for products, I’m the gal!
Thanks!
Miachelle